Vitamin D supplementation found ineffective in preventing colon polyps

Posted on: October 26, 2015   by  John Cannell, MD

img

A colorectal polyp is a fleshy growth occurring on the lining of the colon or rectum. Colon polyps lead to colon cancer if left untreated. One of the reasons that the American Cancer Society recommends a colonoscopy every ten years after the age of 50 is so colon polyps can be identified and removed before they turn cancerous. According to the NIH, colonoscopy every ten years reduces the risk of colon cancer by 50%. Epidemiological data shows that the incidence of colorectal cancer in the USA is decreasing by about 3% per year, probably due to earlier detection.

Most observational studies have found an inverse association between colon cancer/polyps and vitamin D levels. Therefore, it came as a surprise that a well-conducted, multicenter, large, randomized controlled trial of 1,000 IU/day of vitamin D showed it did not prevent colon polyps.

UNC Lineberger-led study finds higher vitamin D and calcium intake does not reduce colorectal polyp risk

Baron JA, Barry EL, Mott LA, Rees JR, Sandler RS, Snover DC, Bostick RM, Ivanova A, Cole BF, Ahnen DJ, Beck GJ, Bresalier RS, Burke CA, Church TR, Cruz-Correa M, Figueiredo JC, Goodman M, Kim AS, Robertson DJ, Rothstein R, Shaukat A, Seabrook ME, Summers RW.  A Trial of Calcium and Vitamin D for the Prevention of Colorectal Adenomas. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 15;373(16):1519-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500409.

I understand that 1,000 IU/day is not a physiological dose, but at the time the trial was devised, 2003, it was considered a high dose. Also, they excluded all subjects with a 25(OH)D less than 12 ng/ml, so we still don’t know if 1,000 IU/day would prevent colon polyps in subjects who were severely vitamin D deficient. It was no conspiracy that led the researchers to exclude subjects < 12 ng/ml; their ethics committee would not allow them to diagnose but not treat severely deficient subjects.

It was a large trial: 2259 subjects. Twenty-five percent received vitamin D supplementation alone, 25% received vitamin D and calcium (1,200 mg/day), 25% were given calcium alone and 25% only received a placebo. They enrolled subjects who had undergone colonoscopy at baseline and had polyps removed; then they studied these subjects for 3-5 years, repeating the colonoscopy. Neither vitamin D nor calcium had an effect, both in an intention to treat analysis and a per protocol analysis, which simply means if they only studied the subjects that took their vitamin D, they still found no effect on colon polyps. So few subjects developed colon cancer (5 total) that they could make any conclusions regarding these findings.

In the supplemental data obtained by Perry Holeman of the Vitamin D Society, it turns out this study determined what happens with adenomas when the control group’s vitamin D status stays at 25 ng/ml and the treatment group’s improved to 32 ng/ml:

End of treatment serum 25-hydroxyvitaminD level – ng/ml                                                         10/21/15

Colon polyps 1

Colon polyps 2

Interestingly, the researchers found a trend for fewer kidney stones in the vitamin D group (P = 0.18). They also found a trend for fewer cancers of any type in the vitamin D group (P=.17). In the calcium group, they found more hypercalcemia (P = .01) but fewer heart attacks (P = .03), which surprised many.

The mean 25(OH)D level of all subjects was about 23 ng/ml at baseline, but when they excluded all subjects with a 25 (OH)D > 23 ng/ml, they still found no effect. The treatment raised the 25(OH)D only 8 ng/ml, but if there was any robust effect of vitamin D on preventing colon polyps, I think this study would have found it.

That leaves us with no explanation of why observational studies show higher 25(OH)D levels are associated with fewer colon polyps and less colon cancer. One possible explanation is sunshine. Remember serum 25(OH)D is not only a marker for vitamin D status, it is a marker of sun exposure. Maybe sun exposure has a non-vitamin D beneficial effect?

4 Responses to Vitamin D supplementation found ineffective in preventing colon polyps

  1. Rita Celone Umile says

    Whether 1,000 iu D3 daily was considered a high dose (back in 2003) is irrelevant (I think). Why do I think this? Because in fact it just isn’t.

    Additionally, a 25(OH)D level of 32 ng/ml is deficiency level (or at least insufficiency level) when we consider the natural 25(OH)D level to fall around 50 ng/ml.

    Certainly I am only an n=1, but I was very ill when my vitamin D level was 32 ng/ml. Good health (for me) kicked in at around 74 ng/ml.

    If we get a few more studies like this perhaps vitamin D can be totally discredited.

    I apologize if my point-of-view is a bit strong here.

    I will say that I do agree that sunlight confers many health benefits besides vitamin D. However, I think that even if one receives all of his or her D thru sun exposure (as nature intended), a 25(OH)D level of 32 ng/ml will still simply lead you to ill health.

    Why? Because 32 ng/ml is NOT a healthy level. It is not natural.

  2. Colchaguino says

    Agree 100% with you Rita. We give 1000 iu to our 2 yr old son.

  3. Rebecca Oshiro says

    I’m pretty surprised this study didn’t find any effect of vitamin D on colorectal polyps because the Lappe trial found a significant reduction in all cancers with 1100 IU vitamin D plus calcium administration. Still, I have no doubts that sun exposure is infinitely superior to vitamin D supplementation. Not only does it produce nitric oxide and beta-endorphins in the skin, but exposure to sunlight also induces expression of p53, a tumor-suppressing protein that ultimately upregulates the expression of genes that exert anti-inflammatory effects.

  4. rcbaker200@comcast.net says

    We shouldn’t forget that colon cancer also has some major other risk factors such as dietary fat (meat, etc). and even cigarette smoking. If the study didn’t take those in account it would be easy for no effect to show up.

Test Your Vitamin D Levels at Home!

Our in-home Vitamin D Test Kit is easy, affordable, and an accurate way to find out your Vitamin D status.

order NOW

We need your help!

We're spreading awareness on Vitamin D Deficiency
Donate NOW
Latest Articles
img
New study suggests higher vitamin D levels associated with reduced risk of mortality

A recent study found that vitamin D levels above 32 ng/ml are associated with reduced risk of mortality caused by coronary heart disease.

Weekly Newsletter