A closer look: Common misconceptions about vitamin D
Editor’s note: This is a response by Dr William Grant to a paper recently published in the journal Nature Reviews Endocrinology, titled “Common misconceptions about vitamin D-implications for clinicians.”
The perspective on vitamin D by Rosen and Taylor1 defends the Institute of Medicine’s recommendations on vitamin D. According to http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/, there have been 7891 publications with vitamin D in the title or abstract published since its posting date, but not acknowledged by Rosen and Taylor. This correspondence responds to some of the claims by these authors.
1 Response to A closer look: Common misconceptions about vitamin D
We need your help!
We're spreading awareness on Vitamin D Deficiency
Donate NOWLatest Articles
Weekly Newsletter
Name:
Email Address:
What best describes you?
Sign me up for the regular weekly vitamin D newsletter!
I would like to receive exclusive vitamin D related discounts.
Interested in the relationship between vitamin D and specific health outcomes? Receive personalised newsletters by checking the topics that interest you. (You may check as many topics as you like):
Just curious! Does this mean that his response only shows up here on the blog or does a copy get sent to Maine Medical Center Research Institute, 81 Research Drive, Scarborough, ME 04074, USA?